Modern Python Dependency Management: Pip vs. Poetry vs. PDM
A 2024 guide to Python dependency management, comparing the classic Pip/venv with modern tools like Poetry and PDM to help you choose the right workflow for your project.
Managing dependencies in Python has historically been a source of frustration. The traditional workflow of pip
and requirements.txt
works, but it lacks features like lock files for deterministic builds and robust dependency resolution. In recent years, modern tools like Poetry and PDM have emerged to solve these problems.
Let's compare the classic approach with these new contenders.
The Classic: venv
+ pip
+ requirements.txt
This is the workflow most Python developers first learn.
- Create a virtual environment:
python -m venv .venv
- Activate it:
source .venv/bin/activate
- Install packages:
pip install requests
- Freeze dependencies:
pip freeze > requirements.txt
Strengths:
- Built-in:
venv
is part of the standard library, andpip
is included with most Python distributions. It's available everywhere. - Simple: For small projects, this workflow is straightforward and easy to understand.
Weaknesses:
- No Lock File:
requirements.txt
often contains top-level dependencies (e.g.,requests==2.31.0
). It doesn't pin the versions of sub-dependencies. This means that two developers installing from the samerequirements.txt
could get different versions of underlying packages, leading to the infamous "it works on my machine" problem. - Manual Environment Management: You are responsible for creating and activating the virtual environment.
- Poor Dependency Resolution:
pip
has a basic resolver that can sometimes fail to find a compatible set of packages for complex projects.
Poetry: The All-in-One Solution
Poetry is a tool that aims to manage all aspects of your project: dependency management, packaging, and publishing.
It uses the pyproject.toml
file to define project metadata and dependencies.
Workflow:
- Initialize a project:
poetry new my-project
orpoetry init
in an existing one. - Add a dependency:
poetry add requests
. This does three things:- Finds a compatible version of
requests
. - Adds it to
pyproject.toml
. - Updates the
poetry.lock
file with the exact versions ofrequests
and all its sub-dependencies.
- Finds a compatible version of
- Install dependencies:
poetry install
. This installs from thepoetry.lock
file, guaranteeing a deterministic build.
Strengths:
- True Dependency Locking: The
poetry.lock
file ensures that every developer and every deployment gets the exact same environment. - Excellent Dependency Resolver: Poetry has a more advanced dependency resolver than
pip
, which can handle complex dependency graphs more gracefully. - Integrated Tooling: It manages virtual environments for you automatically and includes tools for building and publishing your package to PyPI.
Weaknesses:
- Opinionated: Poetry manages virtual environments for you, but it stores them in a central cache directory by default, which can be confusing for developers used to seeing a
.venv
folder in their project root.
PDM: The Modern PEP-Compliant Tool
PDM (Python Development Master) is a newer tool that embraces the latest Python packaging standards (PEPs) and offers more flexibility than Poetry.
Like Poetry, it uses pyproject.toml
and a lock file (pdm.lock
).
Workflow:
- Initialize a project:
pdm init
- Add a dependency:
pdm add requests
- Install dependencies:
pdm install
Strengths:
- PEP-Compliant: PDM closely follows the latest packaging PEPs, such as PEP 582 (which proposes a
__pypackages__
directory, eliminating the need for virtual environments) and PEP 621 (for standardizing project metadata). - Flexible: It doesn't manage virtual environments by default (though it can). Its preferred approach with PEP 582 is more modern, though not yet a formal standard.
- Fast: It has a high-performance dependency resolver and can install packages in parallel.
Weaknesses:
- Newer and Less Established: While it's gaining popularity, it doesn't have the same large user base or history as Poetry or Pip.
- PEP 582 is Not Standard: Its default
__pypackages__
approach is not yet an official part of Python, which can cause issues with some tools that expect a traditional virtual environment.
Comparison Table
Feature | pip + venv |
Poetry | PDM |
---|---|---|---|
Locking | No (or via pip-tools ) |
Yes (poetry.lock ) |
Yes (pdm.lock ) |
Configuration | requirements.txt |
pyproject.toml |
pyproject.toml |
Venv Management | Manual | Automatic (in a central cache) | Optional (prefers PEP 582) |
Strengths | Built-in, simple for small projects | All-in-one, robust resolver | PEP-compliant, flexible, fast |
Recommendation for 2024
- For small scripts or simple projects, the classic
pip
andvenv
workflow is still perfectly fine. - For libraries and applications that will be shared or deployed, Poetry is the recommended choice. It provides a stable, all-in-one solution that solves the core problems of dependency management and packaging with a mature and reliable tool.
- If you are a packaging enthusiast who wants to be on the cutting edge of Python standards and value flexibility, PDM is an excellent and powerful tool to explore.
By adopting a modern tool like Poetry or PDM, you can eliminate a whole class of dependency-related problems, making your development process smoother and your deployments more reliable.